Praxical.Psych

Aisha Rahman

PTSD following an assault at work fourteen months ago.

37, she/her, pharmacist, married, one childadvancedPTSDtrauma-focusedEMDRprolonged exposure
The teaching point

A case where the evidence base is clear and the sequencing question is everything.

Referral

Assaulted during an attempted robbery at the pharmacy where she works, alone, on an evening shift. She was threatened with a knife, struck, and locked in the dispensary for roughly twenty minutes before a colleague arrived. No serious physical injury. She returned to work after six weeks and has been signed off twice since.

History

PCL-5 at assessment: 58. Intrusions daily, including a specific recurring image of the door handle turning. Nightmares four to five nights a week. She has not been into the dispensary alone since; a colleague accompanies her, which is now an established arrangement that nobody discusses. She takes a different route to work to avoid the street. She has stopped watching television dramas.

Hypervigilance is marked — she sits facing doors, checks locks repeatedly at home, and describes scanning every customer. Sleep is poor. She is irritable with her husband and eight-year-old daughter and describes this as the thing she most wants fixed: "I am not the mother I was."

She has told the full story once, to the police. She has not told her husband the details, and she has not told anybody about the twenty minutes locked in, which she refers to as "waiting". She becomes quiet and still when the topic approaches.

Appraisals

  • "I should have seen it coming — I let him in."
  • "If I let myself think about it properly I will fall apart and not come back."
  • "Nowhere is safe; I just used to be naive."
  • "My daughter can tell there is something wrong with me."

Formulation notes

The Ehlers and Clark model fits well: a sense of current threat produced by disjointed, poorly elaborated trauma memory and by negative appraisals of the event, of herself, and of her own reactions — maintained by avoidance, safety behaviours, rumination and thought suppression.

The sequencing question

Trauma-focused CBT, prolonged exposure, cognitive processing therapy and EMDR all have strong first-line evidence for PTSD, and direct comparisons show broad equivalence. The clinically consequential question is not which of them but when: whether to begin trauma-focused work now, or to stabilise first. The stabilisation-first orthodoxy has been substantially challenged — evidence suggests most patients tolerate trauma-focused work earlier than clinicians assume, and that delaying it prolongs suffering.

Sessions with this person

Your formulation

Before reading further, write your own two-sentence formulation of this person — then take it to the Formulation Lab and build it out in a specific tradition.

Saved in this browser only. Export from Progress.
Educational use only

Praxical.Psych is a teaching tool. It is not medical, clinical, psychological or legal advice, not a diagnosis, not treatment, not supervision, and not a credential. Nothing here creates a clinician–patient or solicitor–client relationship. Every patient, case, transcript and simulated session is fictional. Clinical and legal requirements vary by jurisdiction and change over time — verify anything that bears on a real decision against your own regulator, statute and current professional guidance, and consult a qualified professional.

Do not enter real patient information. If you or someone else is in crisis: US & Canada 988 · UK & Ireland 116 123 · Australia 13 11 14 · elsewhere findahelpline.com · immediate danger, your local emergency number.

Praxical.Psych · © 2026 Moonlit Social Labs. All rights reserved.

Before you begin

What Praxical.Psych is, and is not

Praxical.Psych is an educational tool. It teaches the theory, evidence base and clinical method of psychotherapy at the level of an advanced survey course, and it lets you rehearse a complete session in a simulator.

It is not medical, clinical, psychological or legal advice. It cannot diagnose or treat anyone, and it does not state the law where you practise — requirements differ by jurisdiction and change. Nothing here creates a clinician–patient or solicitor–client relationship.

  • Every patient, transcript and case in this app is fictional — a composite written for teaching. None depicts a real person.
  • Praxical.Psych is not therapy, not a substitute for supervision, and not a credential. Competence to practise comes from training, supervised hours and licensure.
  • Scores from the instruments here are for learning how they behave. They are not a diagnosis and not a risk assessment, and must not inform a decision about a real person.
  • Do not enter real patient information. Everything you type stays in this browser, but that is not the same as a compliant clinical record system.
If you are in crisis

In the US and Canada, call or text 988. In the UK and Ireland, call 116 123 (Samaritans). Elsewhere, find a local line at findahelpline.com. In immediate danger, use your local emergency number.

Read the full disclaimer