Integrative formulation
Combine the levels of explanation coherently, and state the reasoning for each borrowed element.
How this document is used well
Integration done well is principled; done badly it is a magpie collecting techniques. The discipline is to state, for each element you import, what it explains that your primary model does not, and what would count as evidence that you were wrong to import it.
| Route to integration | What it combines | Risk |
|---|---|---|
| Technical eclecticism | Techniques selected by evidence and fit, without theoretical merger | Incoherence; a bag of tricks |
| Theoretical integration | Two or more theories merged into a new one | A theory nobody can test |
| Common factors | The ingredients shared across approaches | Nonspecificity; loses what particular methods add |
| Assimilative integration | One home theory that absorbs outside methods | Assimilating so much the home theory disappears |
Complete it
Nothing you type leaves this browser. Do not enter real patient information.
6 required fields outstanding: Cultural, structural and material; Primary organising model; What is imported from elsewhere, and what each import explains that the home model does not …