Praxical.Psych

Cognitive Therapy

Distress is maintained by systematic biases in the appraisal of self, world and future, and it lifts when those appraisals are treated as hypotheses and tested - collaboratively, in conversation and in behaviour - until more accurate and more useful beliefs become available.

1955 – presentCTEvidence: Strong & replicatedChapter 10 · Sessions 11/23–11/30
The claim, in one line

It is not events themselves but the meaning we give them that disturbs us.

Who built it

  • Aaron T. Beck

    1921–2021

    Psychiatrist and psychoanalyst, University of Pennsylvania

    Set out to validate the psychoanalytic theory of depression as anger turned inward, found instead that depressed patients showed a consistent negative bias in the content of their thinking, and built a therapy on that observation. Also produced the field’s most-used measures and a research programme that made CT the most tested psychotherapy in existence.

    Cognitive therapy
  • Albert Ellis

    1913–2007

    Clinical psychologist, New York

    Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy, from 1955 - the first cognitive system, and the earlier of the two by nearly a decade. More philosophical, more confrontational, and organised around disputing irrational demands rather than testing predictions.

    REBT
  • Judith S. Beck

    Director, Beck Institute

    Codified the teaching of CT: the standard session structure, the cognitive conceptualisation diagram, and the training pipeline through which most practitioners now learn the model.

    Cognitive therapy
  • Donald Meichenbaum

    Psychologist, University of Waterloo

    Self-instructional training and stress inoculation training, bringing cognitive method to coping and to preparation for stressors rather than only to disorder.

    Cognitive-behavioural modification

Theory of personality

The cognitive model is a model of information processing. People do not respond to situations; they respond to their construal of situations, and construal is shaped by structures laid down through experience. The theory is therefore about the architecture of meaning-making, and it is deliberately thinner than psychoanalytic personality theory - a feature its proponents defend and its critics attack.

Three levels of cognition

LevelWhat it isAccessibilityExample
Automatic thoughtsSituation-specific appraisals, running continuously just below focal attentionReadily accessible once attention is trained on them"She didn’t reply. She’s finally seen through me."
Intermediate beliefsRules, attitudes and conditional assumptions - the "if/then" and "should" layerAccessible with inference and questioning"If I let anyone see I’m struggling, they’ll lose respect for me."
Core beliefs / schemasAbsolute, global statements about self, others and world, usually formed earlyOften out of awareness until activated; felt as fact, not belief"I am defective." "People leave."

Beck grouped core beliefs into three broad categories - helplessness ("I am incompetent, trapped, out of control"), unlovability ("I am unwanted, defective, bound to be abandoned"), and worthlessness ("I am bad, immoral, toxic"). Most clinical presentations cluster around one, with the others recruited under stress.

Modes and the diathesis–stress logic

Schemas are latent structures, not permanent states. The diathesis-stress account holds that a schema laid down early lies dormant until matched by a congruent life event, at which point it activates and dominates processing - which is why an intelligent, functioning person can, within days of a specific loss, become someone who genuinely cannot see evidence of their own competence. Later Beckian theory organises schemas into modes: coordinated cognitive, affective, motivational and behavioural packages that switch on together.

Theory of psychopathology

Each disorder has a characteristic cognitive content - the cognitive content-specificity hypothesis, one of the model’s genuinely testable and largely supported predictions.

DisorderCharacteristic cognitive contentMaintaining behaviour
DepressionLoss and deprivation; the negative cognitive triad - self, world, futureWithdrawal, inactivity, rumination
Anxiety disordersThreat and danger; overestimated probability and cost, underestimated copingAvoidance, safety behaviours, checking
Panic disorderCatastrophic misinterpretation of benign bodily sensationInteroceptive avoidance, escape, carrying anxiolytics
Social anxietyNegative evaluation by others; excessive self-focused attentionSafety behaviours, post-event processing
OCDInflated responsibility, thought-action fusion, intolerance of uncertaintyCompulsions, reassurance seeking, mental neutralising
PTSDCurrent threat; negative appraisals of the trauma, of self, and of one’s reactionsAvoidance, suppression, rumination about "why me"
AngerTransgression, injustice, deliberate offence by anotherRetaliation, rehearsal
ParanoiaDeliberate malevolent intent directed at the selfHypervigilance, withdrawal, pre-emption
Eating disordersOvervaluation of shape, weight and their control as the basis of self-worthRestriction, checking, avoidance of exposure

Cognitive distortions

The named distortions are teaching tools rather than natural kinds. Their purpose is to give the patient a vocabulary for catching processing errors in flight - the label is not the point, the noticing is.

All-or-nothing thinking
Categories with no middle. "If I’m not the best on the team I’m worthless."
Overgeneralisation
One instance becomes a rule. "I always ruin things."
Mental filter
Attending only to the negative detail while the rest of the picture is discarded.
Disqualifying the positive
Actively converting positive evidence into nothing. "They were only being kind."
Mind reading
Assuming knowledge of others’ thoughts without evidence.
Fortune telling
Predicting the negative outcome as if it were established fact.
Catastrophising
Going to the worst case and treating it as the likely case.
Emotional reasoning
Taking the feeling as evidence of the fact. "I feel like a fraud, so I must be one."
Should statements
Rigid demands on self or others, producing guilt or anger.
Labelling
Attaching a global identity to a specific behaviour. Not "I made an error" but "I am a failure."
Personalisation
Taking responsibility for events one did not control.
Magnification / minimisation
Inflating one’s errors and deflating one’s strengths - the binocular trick.

Theory of change

Beliefs change when they are treated as hypotheses rather than facts, and then tested with evidence the patient gathers and finds credible. Two routes, used together.

Verbal / evaluative route

  • Guided discovery and Socratic questioning
  • Examining evidence for and against
  • Generating alternative explanations
  • Decatastrophising: "and then what?"
  • Cost–benefit analysis of holding the belief
  • Reattribution - distributing responsibility across all causes

Experiential / behavioural route

  • Behavioural experiments that test a specific prediction
  • Activity scheduling and mastery/pleasure ratings
  • Graded task assignment
  • Dropping safety behaviours to allow disconfirmation
  • Exposure, where avoidance is central
  • Surveys and information gathering outside the room

The behavioural route generally produces larger and more durable belief change than the verbal route, which is why "behavioural experiment" and not "thought record" is the workhorse of contemporary cognitive therapy. Reasoning one’s way to a new belief tends to produce the "I know it in my head but not in my gut" complaint; running an experiment that violates the prediction does not.

What actually mediates outcome

The dismantling literature is uncomfortable for a strict reading of the model. Jacobson’s 1996 component analysis found behavioural activation alone as effective as full CT for depression. Studies of mechanism have repeatedly failed to establish that cognitive change precedes and causes symptom change rather than accompanying it. A serious contemporary position holds that cognitive therapy works, that its behavioural components are doing a large share of the work, and that the cognitive account of *why* it works remains under-determined. Learning the model and holding this reservation simultaneously is what distinguishes a sophisticated practitioner from a technician.

Key concepts

The vocabulary you need to read the literature and to be understood in supervision.

Where it sits in the transtheoretical grid

Which change processes the system leans on, and at what level of content it aims.

Change processes emphasised
  • Consciousness raising

    Increasing information about oneself and the problem - feedback, interpretation, education, observation.

  • Self-reevaluation

    Appraising how one thinks and feels about oneself with respect to the problem; values clarification.

  • Counterconditioning

    Substituting an incompatible response for the problem response - relaxation, assertion, exposure, defusion, opposite action.

  • Self-liberation (choosing)

    Choosing and committing to act, plus the belief that one can change - the deliberate exercise of agency.

  • Contingency management

    Rewarding oneself or being rewarded by others for making changes; managing consequences deliberately.

  • Stimulus control

    Restructuring the environment so that problem cues are less likely and healthy cues more likely.

Content levels targeted
  • Maladaptive cognitions
  • Symptom & situational problems
  • Current interpersonal conflicts
Compare against other systems

Your notes

Saved in this browser only. Export from Progress.
Educational use only

Praxical.Psych is a teaching tool. It is not medical, clinical, psychological or legal advice, not a diagnosis, not treatment, not supervision, and not a credential. Nothing here creates a clinician–patient or solicitor–client relationship. Every patient, case, transcript and simulated session is fictional. Clinical and legal requirements vary by jurisdiction and change over time — verify anything that bears on a real decision against your own regulator, statute and current professional guidance, and consult a qualified professional.

Do not enter real patient information. If you or someone else is in crisis: US & Canada 988 · UK & Ireland 116 123 · Australia 13 11 14 · elsewhere findahelpline.com · immediate danger, your local emergency number.

Praxical.Psych · © 2026 Moonlit Social Labs. All rights reserved.

Before you begin

What Praxical.Psych is, and is not

Praxical.Psych is an educational tool. It teaches the theory, evidence base and clinical method of psychotherapy at the level of an advanced survey course, and it lets you rehearse a complete session in a simulator.

It is not medical, clinical, psychological or legal advice. It cannot diagnose or treat anyone, and it does not state the law where you practise — requirements differ by jurisdiction and change. Nothing here creates a clinician–patient or solicitor–client relationship.

  • Every patient, transcript and case in this app is fictional — a composite written for teaching. None depicts a real person.
  • Praxical.Psych is not therapy, not a substitute for supervision, and not a credential. Competence to practise comes from training, supervised hours and licensure.
  • Scores from the instruments here are for learning how they behave. They are not a diagnosis and not a risk assessment, and must not inform a decision about a real person.
  • Do not enter real patient information. Everything you type stays in this browser, but that is not the same as a compliant clinical record system.
If you are in crisis

In the US and Canada, call or text 988. In the UK and Ireland, call 116 123 (Samaritans). Elsewhere, find a local line at findahelpline.com. In immediate danger, use your local emergency number.

Read the full disclaimer