Experiential therapies
Work with emotion directly, and understand why arousal alone is not enough.
What you should be able to do afterwards
- 1Explain the paradoxical theory of change
- 2Classify an emotion as primary adaptive, primary maladaptive, secondary or instrumental
- 3Identify a marker and select the matching task
- 4Explain the arousal-plus-reflection finding and its clinical implication
The reading
The central empirical result of this unit: emotional arousal in session predicts outcome only when it is combined with reflection and meaning-making. High arousal with low reflection predicts poor outcome. This is the finding that separates emotion-focused therapy from the cathartic traditions it grew out of, and it should change what you do in the room.
What belongs to this unit
- systemGestalt Therapy→
- systemEmotion-Focused Therapy→
- sessionA two-chair sessionnot yet written
Questions to take away
For a seminar, a supervisor, or an argument with yourself.
- 1What distinguishes a therapeutic emotional experience from an intense one?
- 2Chair work has more evidence than the tradition that invented it. How did that happen, and what does it suggest?
- 3When is empty-chair work contraindicated, and how would you know before starting?